On 3/1/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:26 -0800, matthew.hawthorne wrote: > > Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > The question with DateRange is whether this is a direction that [lang] > > > should go in. Joda-Time has demonstrated that there are many weird and > > > strange things to consider when dealing with dates. > > > > Understood. Well, in the meanwhile, it's in Bugzilla until a final > > yes/no decision is appropriate. I had a need for the class, but if > > [lang] isn't a good fit, then that's obviously fine too. > > i've been using similar DateRange objects for the last three years. they > proved very useful and popular. there are lots of very useful set > theoretic operations possible on collectives. > <snip/>
<OT> No doubt its popular, someone even contributed a dateRange RDC [1] few months back. </OT> -Rahul [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/rdc-doc/index.html#dateRange --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
