DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38792>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38792 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-06 20:05 ------- Has it been shown that the PADDING caching actually benefits anything? I think it should be removed as it's just going to consume more and more memory until the StringUtils class is unloaded. Either way the StringUtils.padding(int,char) should be changed to use a StringBuffer. I'd change the method to: private static String padding(int repeat, char padChar) { StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(repeat); while (sb.length() < repeat) { pad = pad.concat(pad); } return sb.toString(); } and remove the PADDING static field. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
