I'm in favour of dropping this, or limiting it to just ASCII 32-128.
I fear it was a premature optimisation on my part way back when.
Stephen
Gary Gregory wrote:
Seems like a good idea. Since PADDING is private, the change will not
create an incompatibility.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 11:34 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] lazy load of PADDING in StringUtils
Anyone against switching the PADDING variable to lazily load in the
padding function?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38792
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
