Ah? It turns out that I want to use the formatter in the text package. The last time I looked at it and added more tests it seemed fine. Is there anything in particular that needs addressing? The unit test coverage from Corbertura is 98% which should be easy to get to 100%
Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 12:20 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] lazy load of PADDING in StringUtils and Release > > I think there is still work in the text package, notably on the formatter. > > Stephen > > > Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hello: > > > > Can we take care of this PADDING issue and think of a release? It's been > > too long IMO. Are there any roadblocks? > > > > Gary > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 11:34 PM > >>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > >>Subject: [lang] lazy load of PADDING in StringUtils > >> > >>Anyone against switching the PADDING variable to lazily load in the > >>padding function? > >> > >>http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38792 > >> > >>Hen > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
