On 3/7/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul Akolkar wrote: <snip/> > > > > If this proposal means a departure from the "rest of Commons" of the > > part of the community that is interesting only in JLC, then this is a > > loss. While you (Stephen) may be inclined towards the shallow-broad > > variety, the fact that the latest usecase for scxml comes out of your > > slides is still invaluable, IMO. We have to address the future of > > *all* of Commons in such proposals, I tend to feel they're a tad > > incomplete otherwise. > > You asked about the 'rest of commons'. But I don't want to dictate, I > really don't. I'd prefer that those who are active in these areas made a > couple more groups from the remainder of commons. > <snap/>
Stephen - I appreciate you taking a stab at this. While I did use an example that had your "API style preference" in it, it wasn't my intent to put you (or any single person) on the spot at all. As I mentioned, I believe *we* need to think about Commons/Jakarta as a whole -- and JLC isn't declaring victory by itself. Lets hope this thread (and the others already on general@) spawn the beginnings of good things for roC. Again, thank you. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
