On 3/11/06, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 3/11/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would fear of a library providing such functionality be enormous... > >> any modularity in commons-math planned ? > >> > > > >Good question, which comes up over and over again in [math]. That's > >why I suggested that we focus on primality testing, which is something > >with practical applications and that could define a more narrow scope. > > I don't see any harm in experimenting a little in this area. Could > >be I am wrong though and this will lead us off into a large amount of > >code. I am not a number theorist and have only passing familiarity > >with the algorithms for primality testing. WDYT? > > > > Actually, I am a number theorist (by training, not my day-job :). I'm > interested enough that I could review submissions in this area. Of course, > I have karma to commit them as well, but I don't like to step on toes for > projects that I haven't really been active in ;-).
+1 - consider youself drafted ;-) Please feel free to jump in any time. I am sure the all of the eccentricly orbiting [math] ppl will be happy to have a number theorist in our midst. Thanks! Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
