On 3/22/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like some of this code depends on Java 1.4. Code like: > > assert Thread.holdsLock(pool); > > Java 1.4 as a dependency is fine with me but is that really what [pool] > should depend on?
It's been my plan to take advantage of Java 1.4 features with the release of the Pool 2 major release. It's not like Pool 1.x will disappear from existence so 1.3 compatibility is still available. I'm pretty sure the most common use of Pool is for database connection pooling in J2EE containers and they depend on Java 1.4. I also plan to eventually take advantage of Java 1.5 with Pool 3 by using generics, java.util.concurrent features, and add JMX monitoring support. See: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/PoolRoadMap#preview > > -----Original Message----- > > From: robert burrell donkin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:02 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: [pool] composite pool donation signed off > > > > the code is in contrib. i'll leave it to others to move this code into > > the trunk. please use svn copy to execute the move so that the history > > is preserved. > > > > - robert > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Sandy McArthur "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
