Carlos Sanchez wrote:
no, scope is different than optional
<properties>
<optional>true</optional>
</properties>
What is the definition of an optional dependency ? It depends on the use
of the library. If I use a plist configuration most of the time I would
not want the commons-codec dependency to be excluded for example.
There are several dependency sets depending on the features you are
interested in as described here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/configuration/dependencies.html
It's not obvious to decide what is optional imho.
Emmanuel Bourg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]