> > I haven't dug into Dbcp code but I think the GenericObjectPool is deep > within Dbcp as an internal data structure and I'd be surprised if it > let you specify a specific pool implementation.
Does anyone else think that this should be different? Suggestion: The next version of DBCP should allow you to specify your own implementation in a configuration file. I know that I was looking around for this feature when I first was exploring DBCP and POOL. -Pete
