robert burrell donkin a écrit :
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:42 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote:
-0 because for me, and mentioned by some others, the name "scxml" is
so opaque. When I look at the name I have no clue what it is. I know
it's verbose but simply expanding the "SC" to StateChartXML would
change my mind to full support. (The "StateChartXML" name would be the
same length as "Configuration".)
+1
i also prefer statechartXML or even commons-statechart
+1 for commons-statechart, that sounds better and is more descriptive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
