4 classes: * StrBuilder * StrMatcher * StrTokenizer * VariableFormatter
StrBuilder and StrTokenizer make immediate sense. StrMatcher less so, I'm not sure when I'd use it etc, so code examples in the javadoc might be useful. VariableFormatter is a good class to have I think - it's a common need and I like the description in the javadoc - but I'm a little unsure about the interface. My gut feels that it's a bit too much. We should be offering a basic service but not encouraging things to grow into template languages, and especially not spawning a series of alternative implementations. Kudos on the high level of unit test coverage - cobertura suggests 98% for the text package. Please disregard my "should lang.text go in 2.2/3.0?" in the previous email. It looks good. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
