DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39393>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39393 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-28 06:40 ------- Playing at writing a unit test for this - I'm interested in whether this fixes a bug in a previous release or just improves the code. Can't have a JUnit class implement Runnable it seems, so bit more code needed test-wise. Takayuki - does anything bad happen when it's not synchronized? Did you have an exception (NullPointerException?), or is this a case of seeing an improvement by looking at the source? When I look at the three load method calls, nothing jumps out as likely to break even when running as non-threadsafe, but obviously can't have any real idea on that without testing :) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
