DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39393>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39393





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-28 06:40 -------
Playing at writing a unit test for this - I'm interested in whether this fixes 
a bug in a previous release or 
just improves the code. Can't have a JUnit class implement Runnable it seems, 
so bit more code needed 
test-wise.

Takayuki - does anything bad happen when it's not synchronized? Did you have an 
exception 
(NullPointerException?), or is this a case of seeing an improvement by looking 
at the source?

When I look at the three load method calls, nothing jumps out as likely to 
break even when running as 
non-threadsafe, but obviously can't have any real idea on that without testing 
:)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to