On 4/28/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/>
It does seem to be that there's more interest in the full name than the shorter one.
<snap/> I don't think we should imply a x character limit either. Hopefully, everyone will choose the shortest name that still makes sense.
In terms of the J***, we should we be asking infra@ what they want to do. I don't think we should be embracing the J*** bit out of future-worry if they're not concerned. I can agree that a more readable code makes for more readable email subjects (the name is in the body of the jira email not the subject, so hard to filter on that); but the prefixing with J issue then makes it unreadable and doesn't seem necessary.
<snip/> Agreed, lets not have prefixes please.
In terms of ids, obviously one for each project. Do we also want one for Commons in general for build and site issues?
<snip/> Yes.
And I presume we'd have a sandbox project.
<snap/> Yes. Also, are we talking about migrating Commons or Jakarta to JIRA? Finally, take my comments for what they're worth since unfortunately, I have no cycles to contribute towards this move. -Rahul
Hen
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
