On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 22:27 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > Hi, > > To save people reading through below, my summary is: > > <summary> > Some excellent proofreading here, and a number of doc/release-notes > issues have been found by Dennis, as well as a case where we could use > constants instead of inline strings, and one where we should technically > be using a param value instead of a constant in a diagnostic message > (though it doesn't matter in that case anyway). > > However I don't see anything here that I think is worth cancelling the > RC10 vote for. A few items would be good to put up on the wiki under > "1.1 release addendum".
an interesting one, this the release process we use here in the commons (release candidates rather than blessing a concrete distribution) means that there are always changes between the final release candidate and the release distributed. the question is what changes are acceptable and which necessitate another VOTE. we already have changes to the documentation and some to the code formatting committed. more changes (as outlined by dennis) shouldn't really effect the result: either no changes above the minimum version changes are acceptable or cosmetic and documentation ones are. it feels like a long, long we've travelled. after all this effort, i think one final push is worth it. given the fact that the changes are cosmetic and documentation, i think i'll cut one more candidate tomorrow but propose a short length for the vote. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
