On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 20:32 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:11 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > or should we try to create a POM for commons-logging-api or perhaps both? > > > > not sure > > > > the API works best as a virtual dependency. it can be satisfied by JCL > > 1.0.x, 1.1.x, by ceki's adapter or by Torsten's null implementation. not > > sure whether maven 2 handles this ATM. > > Not sure what you mean by "a virtual dependency". I think the api jar > should never be used as a dependency by anyone; it's really only for the > use of tomcat. > > If other people provide jars that define classes o.a.c.l.Log and > LogFactory, then that can be used as a dependency *instead* of depending > on anything from the commons-logging group. Is that what you meant?
pretty much - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
