Do you plan to deploy the sources with the new source plugin ? http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/source/
Arnaud On 6/21/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah. Sounds like something we should be fixing if that's the case. On 6/21/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe... I'll work on this tonight local time (in about 14 hours). > The problem is that "maven dist" calls the maven dist of jelly which is > quite wrong, I think... and I did not want to touch this yet. > If it sounds appropriate and someone can check my candidate sources I > could try this tonight before tagging.... it would only affect, > probably, the maven.xml in jelly/jelly-tags. > > paul > > > Dion Gillard wrote: > > Paul can we post the source/binary distribution release after getting > > the jar out? > > > > On 6/20/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> > Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good > >> > idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one > >> > would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites) > >> > effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs > >> > have accompanying source distros? > >> As a general wish, I only agree. > >> In this case both limit in time and the fact that this tag-library is > >> exactly made of one class tend me to not do so. > >> > Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has > >> > since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as > >> > previous Jelly releases have done). > >> Of course tagging was planned. Do you mean I should tag RC1 as well ? > >> > Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't > >> > around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the plan > >> > (below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to leave > >> > votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36). > >> The fact that I sent this wish already long ago, with less clarity > >> indeed, pushes me here. And also, the fact that maven plugin release is > >> waiting. > >> > >> paul > >> > >> > Thank you for your time towards this release. > >> > -Rahul > >> > > >> > > >> >> thank you in advance. > >> >> > >> >> paul > >> >> > >> >> Paul Libbrecht wrote: > >> >> > Here's the plan: > >> >> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared > >> >> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no > >> risk > >> >> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed). > >> >> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce > >> >> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the > >> repo > >> >> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made. > >> >> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and > >> >> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit > >> a jar > >> >> > upload to iblio's repo. > >> >> > > >> >> > I have assembled the following release candidates... > >> >> > - a site with RC1 version tag: > >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/ > >> >> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject: > >> >> > > >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
