On 7/28/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tapestry is thinking of switching to SL4J instead of Jakarta Commons Logging:
I've been meaning to ask... is there really much reason for a JDK 1.4+ application/library to depend on commons-logging? Sure you could argue that log4j is more powerful, but the same could be said of ORO. Increasingly people just aren't going to care. We're starting to talk about moving to 1.3 so we can get the regexp support without a dependency ([io] for example), when do we start talking about 1.4 so we can drop the commons-logging dependencies? Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
