On 11/7/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/7/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/dbutils-1.0-to-1.1-jardiff.html
> > >
> > > It doesn't look that bad - jardiff complains that we've moved a method
> > > into a superclass in a few places. So a recompile will be needed (I
> > > think) rather than being able to drop the jar in place.
> >
> > You might want to try a clirr report to check for binary compatability.
> > IIRC, moving a method up the hierarchy is binary compatible.
>
> It seems to give the same info:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/dbutils-1.0-to-1.1-clirr.txt
>
<snip/>
INFOs are OK though.
Yep, you're both right. Quick test shows that in 1.3 and 1.5 the JVM
happily switches to the parent method of 1.1 if compiled against the
child method in 1.0.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
