On 5/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/5/17, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Oh, and some source files probably need licenses, e.g.
>
> navigation.xml
> build.xml
>
> PROPOSAL.html
> STATUS.html
Just to help, with Tiles such a problem was a blocker, since a release
cannot be made without all the license in place.
Tiles 2.0.2 was not released for this reason.
I don't believe the above files are an issue since I don't think
either the PROPOSAL.html or STATUS.html are included in the release
(can't check yet until the permissions are rectified) and build.xml
(generated by maven) and navigation.xml don't need them - the policy
FAQ says the following[1]:
"What files in an Apache release do not require a license header?"
"A file without any degree of creativity in either its literal
elements or its structure is not protected by copyright law;
therefore, such a file does not require a license header. If in doubt
about the extent of the file's creativity, add the license header to
the file."
Niall
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
HTH
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
