On 5/18/07, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My preference would be to support JDK1.3 and JDK1.5 versions, rather than JDK1.4.
When you say "support" do you mean two active versions under development or the moving the main development to JDK 1.5 with a JDK 1.3 branch mainly for bug fixes? I don't have a problem with moving to JDK 1.5 - but are you talking evolutionary or revolutionaty (i.e. binary incompatible, package name change etc.) here? Like Jochen IMO it would be better if you expand on your intention.
If desired, these calls can be implemented using reflection, so they work on JDK1.4 but not on JDK1.3.
They could, but Its not something I'd be interested in doing. Niall
Stephen Niall Pemberton wrote: > There are a couple of Jira tickets which require JDK 1.4 > > IO-74[1] - Regular Expression IOFileFilter implementation > IO-77[2] - FileUtils.move() method that uses NIO > > Are there any objections to moving Commons IO's minimum requirement to > JDK 1.4 for Commons IO 1.4? > > Niall > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-74 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-77
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
