--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Pete--
> >
> > I could be interested in being the Jakarta
> commons
> > conduit for a revival of the functor code.
> According
> > to the jakarta website, "A revival of a Commons
> > Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on
> the
> > commons developers mailing list." Is there a
> general
> > feeling on-list as to whether the vote should be
> held,
> <snip/>
>
> I think its good to have the vote as suggested
> (after any preliminary
> discussion here). While its a lower bar than sandbox
> graduation, I
> think its useful to gauge interest and makes it
> harder for the change
> to slip under people's radar etc. As an aside, I do
> not have any
> cycles to help with functor ATM.
Right, I meant "whether the vote should be held" as in
"are there any reasons why reviving [functor] would be
simply out of the question?" I wasn't implying any
desire to circumvent established protocols. :)
-Matt
>
> -Rahul
[SNIP]
____________________________________________________________________________________Get
the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
