[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSACTION-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12514764
 ] 

Oliver Zeigermann commented on TRANSACTION-9:
---------------------------------------------

I think implementing both strategies would be a good idea. I will try to come 
forward with a prototypical proposal for (1) to validate the interfaces. I will 
add a non transactional implementation for our resource manager. 

Peter, maybe you would be willing to adapt your solution to the new 2.0 core 
and give feedback to it as you go along? Would be cool :)

> [transaction] Add full file management capabilities to the FileResourceManager
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TRANSACTION-9
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSACTION-9
>             Project: Commons Transaction
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: Operating System: All
> Platform: All
>            Reporter: Peter Fassev
>            Assignee: Oliver Zeigermann
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>         Attachments: filemanager.zip
>
>
> Hi,
> As stated in the doc the FileResourceManager is:
> "A resource manager for streamable objects stored in a file system"
> I agree, that this is a resource manager, but it could be easily extended, to 
> support a full file management system. It will be very helpful to have 
> additional methods like renameResource(), getResourceSize(), 
> getResourceTime(), 
> setResourceTime() etc. This are common file operations, which should be 
> managed 
> by the FileResourceManager.
> Further it will be very helpful to have (real) support for resource 
> collections 
> (folders). It will be necessary to distinguish between single resources 
> (files) 
> and collections (folders). 
> Together, this features will enable a transactional access to any file based 
> resources - for instance a document repository.
> Are there plans for such extensions and if not, will they actually fit in the 
> goals of the transaction library?
> If not, please open the underlying structure, like the inner class 
> TransactionContext, in order to add extensions the file management. For 
> instance, it will be good to have a separate factory method, which creates 
> the 
> context.
> If you are interested in this proposal, I am ready to contribute to this 
> project. I consider myself as an experienced java developer and I will be 
> glad 
> to help you. 
> Best regards
> Peter Fassev

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to