Let's please leave it the way it is. thanks, dims
On 4/24/06, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got no objection to a name change. I agree the OMDataSource name > could be confusing, though it was the most concise description I could > think of. And no, it does not implement DataSource (though it's somewhat > similar in purpose). I suppose something like OMDataHolder or OMRawData > could be used instead, though these names don't seem to me to fit as > well. I know at least a few people on the list have looked into the code > and know what it's doing - any suggestions or preferences? > > - Dennis > > Thilina Gunarathne wrote: > > >Hi Dennis, > >How about changing the name of the OMDataSource to something else.. > >After looking in to the recent discussions it seems that the name is > >the reason for lot of confusion... > >OMDataSource sounds like it implements the > >javax.activation.DataSource. (I hope it's not.. Frankly I haven't had > >a look at the source) > > > >Just a small suggestion from me... :) > > > >~Thilina > > > >On 4/22/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi Dennis, > >> > >>I re-revert the changes and now you should see them back again in Axiom > >>and Axis2. If there are missing parts, please add them. > >> > >>I also +1 to the idea of OMDataSource. > >> > >>I hope you and all can understand that, I revert your changes not > >>because of a problem with the technical content or anything, but because > >>there was no response from you for question on that and due to RC. So > >>hope this is settled now. > >> > >>And I'd like to have a RC3, ASAP, preferably tomorrow, with these > >>changes. What do you all think about it ? > >> > >>-- Chinthaka > >> > >>Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > >> > >> > >>>If the changes *are* going to make it into Axiom I'll finish up my Axis2 > >>>JiBX code changes tomorrow. Everything was working prior to the Axiom > >>>rollback, with only the unit tests still incomplete. > >>> > >>>I apologize for creating this mess through not subscribing to the proper > >>>email list and properly tracking the state of the project, and for > >>>wasting everyone's time as a result of my ignorance. I find it > >>>personally somewhat ironic that I was one of the people who voted in > >>>favor of moving Axiom out of the Axis2 tree in the first place, but then > >>>didn't follow up on the change myself. I'll work at being a better > >>>Apache team member in the future. > >>> > >>> - Dennis > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >"May the SourcE be with u" > >http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ > >http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ > >http://www.bloglines.com/blog/Thilina > > > > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
