Davanum Srinivas wrote:
You know what. Am tired of this game of control. Just do whatever you
want. I withdraw my -1.
thanks,
dims
I removed the patch and closed the issue. If ever find time, I'll try to
put together another patch based on the exisitng MIME code.
Oleg
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Asankha,
- Existing Axis2 test harness should work out of the box
- There should be no extra dependency jar (MIME4J) in the default
implementation.
Any patch that covers both will get my +1
thanks,
dims
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dims
The package org.apache.axiom.mime defines the interfaces, and the package
org.apache.axiom.mime.impl which implements these using Mime4J. I don't see
why anyone else cannot implement these interfaces with any other
implementation..
Is your view on this still based on the following?
/"One problem from my personal point of view is that for JAXWS support we
need javamail :( to be compliant to the spec/" [1]
asankha
[1] http://markmail.org/message/kfs3mpfkkwvwbdb2
without using MIME4J.
thanks,
dims
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 11:34 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Oleg,
I totally agreed with you if you scroll back a few emails. Yes, we
need to fix *that*. Any patch to do that will be *very* welcome.
Ironically enough, this is precisely what the patch does.
Oleg
--
Asankha C. Perera
http://adroitlogic.org
http://esbmagic.blogspot.com
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
