Yes, The transaction should be initialized by synapse ( and I fixed the transaction mediator to do that) and JMS transport(Sender) should participate in that distributed transaction.
Rajika On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Andreas Veithen <andreas.veit...@gmail.com>wrote: > Rajika, > > That is a valid requirement, but in that case, it is not the > responsibility of the JMS sender to create the transaction. > > Andreas > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:56, Rajika Kumarasiri <raj...@wso2.com> wrote: > > Andreas, > > I think I was not clear with my requirement. Consider a scenario like > this. > > Assume we use synapse and say we pick a message from a database and send > it > > to a JMS queue, using the JMS transport. Now I want this happen to be > > happened in a distributed transaction, i.e. if something went wrong > > (database crash or JMS queue crash) I want to rollback the transaction so > > that I don't loose any messages. > > > > Rajika > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Andreas Veithen > > <andreas.veit...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Rajika, > >> > >> In that case, why do you need a distributed transaction, considering > >> that the JMS sender uses a single resource (the JMS connection > >> factory) and executes a single operation (sending the JMS message)? It > >> seems to me that in that case, you don't need a transaction, and even > >> less a distributed transaction. > >> > >> Andreas > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:33, Rajika Kumarasiri <raj...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Andreas Veithen > >> > <andreas.veit...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > > >> >> Rajika, > >> >> > >> >> Why would the JMS sender ever want to create a new transaction? > >> >> > >> > > >> > In case of only the JMS TransportSender needs to participate in a > >> > distributed transaction. > >> > > >> > Rajika > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Andreas > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
