Well, some people might like it if you addressed the problem addressed by the performance work before we move on, but some people might be disappointed .
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sunday 05 September 2010 8:45:30 am Benson Margulies wrote: >> I see some recent bug reports and even a couple of patches on XmlSchema. >> >> There's the 1.4 branch where we're maintaining the classic code line: Java >> 1.4, lots of unfinished hanging apis, etc. >> >> There's the trunk, where I produced a first pass at a 2.0. I think it >> could be a reasonable forward path, but then again, I'm the author. >> >> I posed a question on the Xerces list about the relationship of XmlSchema >> and Xerces. What I learned is that the Xerces community has no great >> interest in a 'construction' API for W3C XML Schema, as opposed to >> traversal and validation. In part, this is due to the existence of a code >> base at Eclipse. >> >> I have never found the time to go check out the Eclipse alternative. >> >> Anyway, we can just keep on as we are, making small adjustments to the 1.4 >> branch as we go, but I wondered if anyone else has a thought? > > Well, I'd like to see 1.4.7 released with the latest sets of fixes and then > pretty much call it done for 1.4.x and just move onto 2.0. I hate having to > deal with the java 1.4 syntaxes and such. > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog >
