Sung-Gu Please have a look at the following code snippet:
URI uri = new URI( "/yadayada/blabla" ); uri.getHost()); // produces null. uri.getPath()); // produces '/yadayada/blabla'. Everything is cool. However the following behavior appears a bit illogical to me: URI uri = new URI( "yadayada/blabla" ); uri.getHost()); // produces null. Should not it be 'yadayada'? uri.getPath()); // produces 'host/path'. Should not it be '/blabla'? I believe if uri is incomplete (no explicit protocol specified) and it does not begin with / per default URI class constructor should assume URI to begin with a host name followed by path, rather then a path with host being null. Is there a reason for current behavior of the URI class constructor? Thanks Oleg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
