Simon, Aurelien, Ingo

Please help me help you. 

I seem unable to reproduce the problem in my development environment
Redhat 8.0 + Sun JDK 1.2.2 + Tomcat 4.1.18 (running on Sun JDK 1.4.1).
The problem does appear system specific. We need to narrow the problem
down somewhat. The problem appears to manifest itself primarily on
Windows platforms, but it's just a hypothesis at the moment

Could anyone of you try to come up with a test case that reliably
reproduces the problem? Could you also set up HttpClient test webapp,
run test cases in your environment and let me know the results?

http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/testwebapp.html

Cheers

Oleg


On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 02:19, Simon Roberts wrote:
> Windows XP, Sun JDK 1.4.1_01
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Oleg Kalnichevski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Commons HttpClient Project" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:31 AM
> Subject: Re: HTTP Post and HTTP/100 (continue)
> 
> 
> > Simon
> > There's only one possible cause of the problem I can think of at the
> > moment is not flushing the output stream. If my assumption proves wrong,
> > I'll be left completely clueless. What OS are you using, btw? Somehow, I
> > have an impression that the problem is platform dependent.
> > Oleg
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 23:17, Simon Roberts wrote:
> > > Attached is a log of my application (log4j, with most of the
> > > HttpConnection.isResponseAvaliable messages removed)
> > >
> > > BTW: typo in method name
> > >
> > > The interesting bit is that it times out (3 seconds) rather than getting
> the
> > > 100-continue response. Then, after it has send the body, the
> 100-continue
> > > response is received and returned (which is what is actually causing my
> > > problem).  The server is a current release version of Jetty
> > > http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty/ which appears to be working perfectly in
> all
> > > other regards.
> > >
> > > I get the same problem with HTTP PUT.
> > >
> > > Adding
> > >
> > >   method.setUseExpectHeader(false);
> > >
> > > seems to fix it.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Simon
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Oleg Kalnichevski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Commons HttpClient Project"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: "Simon Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:18 PM
> > > Subject: Re: HTTP Post and HTTP/100 (continue)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Simon
> > > > I'd really appreciate it if you could send us the debug trace for
> > > > analysis. Please refer to the following url for instructions on how
> wire
> > > > log can be activated:
> > > >
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/logging.html
> > > >
> > > > Your problem should be easily solvable by disabling "100-continue"
> > > > handshake.
> > > >
> > > > PostMethod myhttppost = new PostMethod();
> > > > myhttppost.setUseExpectHeader(false);
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Oleg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 00:29, Simon Roberts wrote:
> > > > > Gidday,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is probably a dumb-user question, but if it is, then it might
> need
> > > to
> > > > > be documented for other dumb users :)
> > > > >
> > > > > I just checked out the latest CVS HttpClient and tried it with my
> > > > > application (it's using HEAD from a month or two ago), and am having
> a
> > > > > problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > Our app does HTTP POST (to a Jetty server, as it happens).
> Previously,
> > > > > httpclient used to just push the request header and body along in
> one
> > > lump,
> > > > > and when the server posted a http-100 (continue) status, it used to
> > > complain
> > > > > about "continue received, but body already sent".  Anyway, it used
> to
> > > work
> > > > > okay for us...
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, the httpClient.execute(method) returns 100, and there is no
> > > response
> > > > > (body) from the server, so my app barfs.
> > > > >
> > > > > The question is, how do I make httpclient send the body of the
> request?
> > > > > (maybe after I get the 100 back).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers, thanks, Simon
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to