Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
Jandalf, Just to make sure I got you right: both getResponseContentLength()/getRequestContentLength() methods should be added to the HttpMethod interface? Cheers Oleg
-----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 11. März 2003 16:32 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11190] - need getResponseContentLength in HttpMethod
The patch adds getResponseContentLength to HttpMethodBase, which is good, but it should also go into the HttpMethod interface. I think that this is a "safe" change at this point.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11190>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11190
need getResponseContentLength in HttpMethod
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-11 10:31 ------- Created an attachment (id=5260) Fix (take 1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]