Mike, Of course, the users should be able to do silly things if they insist. But do not think we should actively participate. I find current HttpClieet's behavior correct. At the same time, I could live with a patch Oleg On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 20:48, Michael Becke wrote: > > This makes sense from an internal point of view, but from a user's > > perspective it's kind of weird: You call removeRequestHeader and it > > doesn't get removed. I was wondering if we should modify HttpMethodBase > > so that it adds the default User-Agent header in the constructor and in > > recycle() instead. That way, removeRequestHeader would work. > > > > If folks think this is a good idea, I'll submit a patch. > > My only concern is that a method should contain a User-Agent header, > according to the RFC. If people don't see this as such a big deal then I > say go for it. > > Mike > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
