Yes, 4 sounds correct. 3 of them were just from "http" string literals that should have been using getProtocol(). Only one was a real error, but it seems to have been fixed by your last Expect patch.

Mike

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:

Thanks, Mike. However, I think it's an overstatement. There's a
difference between being able to speak a language correctly and speaking
it natively. ExpectContinueMethod somehow does sound right to me.
Anyways, it could have been worse.


I ran our standard test cases through a proxy and found four cases
failing on me. How many tests failed in your case?

Cheers
Oleg

On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 19:47, Michael Becke wrote:
I don't have anything ready to commit yet. I am also testing SSL with a
proxy. I have discovered a few minor test case problems that I am still
trying to fix. I have also noticed that using SSL with a proxy is
verrrry slow:)


From the quality of your writing I would say your English is as good as
mine:) I think ExpectContinueMethod is a fine name.


Mike



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to