Mike, The patch looks fine. I think it's good to be committed. I have just started working on URLEncoder/URLDecoder port to commons-codec, as there's a relative lull in HttpClient core development, anyway. I believe it's the right moment to get this done. Any objections to that?
Oleg -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 6/23/2003 14:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20481] - HttpClient does not properly handle 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' encoding DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20481>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20481 HttpClient does not properly handle 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' encoding ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-23 12:29 ------- Hi Laura, Thank you for looking over the patch. I agree that we might want to spilt this functionality when moving to codec. For the moment though I think it's okay to keep it together. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
