DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21210>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21210 HeaderElement#parse(String) implementation is not optimal [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Addition to header parsing |HeaderElement#parse(String) |due to Local Director |implementation is not | |optimal Target Milestone|--- |2.1 Final Version|2.0 Alpha 2 |2.0 Beta 1 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-01 12:05 ------- Luca, I believe the way HeaderElement#parse(String) method is currently implemented is sub-optimal. The idea is to completely do away with that ugly check for comma in the expiry date and let the DateParser decide whether the expiry date is malformed or not. But we can't make such a radical change in 2.0 release. It will have to wait until 2.1 Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
