Not extremely urgent, but I would definately be interested in using it when
you make it available.
"Kalnichevski, Oleg"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Commons HttpClient Project"
point.com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
08/14/2003 10:45 AM Subject: RE: JDK 1.1.8
problems
Please respond to "Commons
HttpClient Project"
Odi, I was thinking about it. I do not mind making my Java 1.1 fork
available. The trouble is that it is quite outdated. There is a very high
likelihood that I will get a chance to update it before December this year,
but I would like to wait as long as I can in order to base it on one of our
2.1-beta releases (hopefully coming out by that time). As far as I am
concerned 2.0 is already a legacy platform.
David, let me know how urgently you need a Java 1.1 compatible version of
HttpClient. If waiting is an option, I'll happily share my HttpClient fork
with you as soon as I get a chance to bring it up to date
Oleg
-----Original Message-----
From: Ortwin Gl�ck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:37 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
Oleg,
just an idea: maybe you can open a sourceforge.net project with the
1.1.8 version of HttpClient and share it with David. Should be
compatible with the Apache License but still distinguish it from the
'official' build.
Odi
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
> If you are able to sleep comfortably having shipped such a library to
> your clients, good for you. I am not. Facing similar dilemma a year
> ago I ended up forking HttpClient.
>
> Oleg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
