Not extremely urgent, but I would definately be interested in using it when you make it available.
"Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Commons HttpClient Project" point.com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: 08/14/2003 10:45 AM Subject: RE: JDK 1.1.8 problems Please respond to "Commons HttpClient Project" Odi, I was thinking about it. I do not mind making my Java 1.1 fork available. The trouble is that it is quite outdated. There is a very high likelihood that I will get a chance to update it before December this year, but I would like to wait as long as I can in order to base it on one of our 2.1-beta releases (hopefully coming out by that time). As far as I am concerned 2.0 is already a legacy platform. David, let me know how urgently you need a Java 1.1 compatible version of HttpClient. If waiting is an option, I'll happily share my HttpClient fork with you as soon as I get a chance to bring it up to date Oleg -----Original Message----- From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:37 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems Oleg, just an idea: maybe you can open a sourceforge.net project with the 1.1.8 version of HttpClient and share it with David. Should be compatible with the Apache License but still distinguish it from the 'official' build. Odi Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: > If you are able to sleep comfortably having shipped such a library to > your clients, good for you. I am not. Facing similar dilemma a year > ago I ended up forking HttpClient. > > Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]