Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons HttpClient 2.0 Release Candidate 2

[Michael Becke]

These are some definite benefits.  I think that Mark's concerns are 
also valid.  The presence of an exe installer might indicate to users 
that HttpClient is an application instead of a library.  If we do 
decide to implement the installer I think we will have to address this 
question in documentation, etc.

Mike

On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 02:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

"Wilcox, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/10/2003 03:47:06 PM:

Um -- but Maven and Tomcat are applications, HttpClient is a
library. And given the variety of ways that you can import a library
with Java, I'm not sure exactly what the Win32 would give you over 
unzip
& go.

1) Display and acceptance of license
2) Start/Programs/ Menu option with links to installed docs, samples, 
home
page and bug reporting system etc
3) Easy uninstall for the user.
4) Easier to start with for a novice.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]