Eric brings up the very problem that I was worried about. I am wary to update the license in mid release.

Oleg, I agree with your plan. We should plan to finish the release and move to license 2.0 when we need to.

Mike

On Feb 4, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:

Eric,
I think you've made a very good point. Besides, as far as I understand
we can still stick to the version 1.1 if we manage to put the final
release together before the end of the month:

"...
The Apache License, version 2.0, was approved for use by Apache projects
as of January 21, 2004, with all Apache projects required to move to the
new license by March 1, 2004
..."


I believe we should cut the final release rather sooner than later, and
then upgrade to the AL v2.0

Oleg

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 19:14, Eric Johnson wrote:
Knowing the speed with which corporate legal departments can move, I
would hope for keeping the old license for the 2.0 release.

I think it would be unfair/surprising for clients to discover that they
would have to do a legal an unexpected legal review just for the sake of
eliminating a few bugs. In the case of my company, that would probably
keep us using 2.0rc3 for a few extra releases.


Then again, I'll have to check with legal....

On the other hand, given the small bandwidth for developers here,
perhaps it is just better to make the change, rather than messing around
with the PMC.


-Eric.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26382>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26382

Update license terms





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-03 03:00 -------
I'm wondering if we should change licenses in mid release. I do not know if 2.0 causes any
problems for users, but it seems like a pretty big change for this release. Perhaps we can wait until
after 2.0 is released. How does everyone feel about this?


Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to