Mike
On Feb 17, 2004, at 3:53 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
We can certainly rename it to just 2.0+1 from me
Oleg
-----Original Message----- From: Adrian Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 04:45 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons HttpClient 2.0 Final
On 17/2/04 1:14 PM, "Michael Becke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for adding the jar to ibiblio. I added the jar to '/www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-httpclient/' and thought this was supposed to replicate with ibiblio. Perhaps this is not working correctly.
There's no real reason it's called 2.0 final I guess. This was just the value I chose. We can certainly rename it to just 2.0. What does everyone think?
Mike
2.0 is a lot more predictable so I'd change to that instead. We postfix all
our development versions anyway so it's clear that it's the final version by
the lack of a postfix.
BTW, great work to all involved in the release! It's nice to finally have
it out the door.
Regards,
Adrian Sutton.
---------------------------------------------- Intencha "tomorrow's technology today" Ph: 38478913 0422236329 Suite 8/29 Oatland Crescent Holland Park West 4121 Australia QLD www.intencha.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
