Any comments on this one? I'd like to work this patch, and the one for idle connection timeout, into 2.0. How does everyone feel about that?

Mike

On Mar 15, 2004, at 6:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589

MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 11:27 -------
Hi Mike,


Thanks for this patch, I just reviewed the code and it does meet our
requirements, it would be great if it could be part of 2.0 code base
especially as your implementation is safe because it should have no side
effect for applications not using this new feature.


Gael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to