Mike, I believe the only way to find this out is to approach the infrastructure folks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Oleg On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 15:30, Michael Becke wrote: > Yes, unfortunately the nightly builds are from HEAD. I'm not sure if > we can create both 2.0 and HEAD nightly builds. Anyone know more about > this? > > Mike > > > On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589>. > > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589 > > > > MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 09:27 > > ------- > > Thanks. > > > > It seems that the nightly builds are done on the HEAD only, so I guess > > I have > > to retrieve the source from CVS and build myself. > > > > Or is there any plan to have nightly builds for 2.0 support also? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
