DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24154>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24154

Setting CONNECTION_TIMEOUT and SO_TIMEOUT on a per-method basis





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-04-27 22:18 -------
I have spent weeks thinking about a solution to this problem. I tend to conclude
that CONNECTION_TIMEOUT and SO_TIMEOUT should simply be moved back to the
HttpMethod/HttpClient level. It would be the easiest and least messy solution

How do you feel about it?

Oleg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to