On Jul 15, 2004, at 1:09 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:

(1) Are you using SSL?

No

(2) What's the JRE version you are using?

Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-117.1)

(3) What web server you are targeting?

We are using Apache Tomcat with Slide for WebDAV support.


(4) Are you going through a proxy?

I'm hitting the server directly at the moment. I will be going through a proxy eventually.


Jen



Oleg

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 1:49
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Having some problems with "expect 100 continue"


All,

I'm now calling setUseExpectHeader(true) for my putMethod. However, I'm
running into a few problems.

First, when putting a 1 character text file (Content-Length: 3) it
doesn't authorize and eventually I get the 'Maximum redirects (100)
exceeded' exception.

If I take a slightly larger text file (Content-Length: 7), then all is
fine. However, I do get the INFO message:

Jul 14, 2004 4:40:33 PM org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase
processRequest
INFO: Recoverable exception caught when processing request

If I try to put a 1MB mpg file, the request appears to hang with:

Jul 14, 2004 4:41:44 PM org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase
writeRequest
INFO: 100 (continue) read timeout. Resume sending the request

Any suggestions? I did try this with the latest build of HttpClient
also and had similar results.

Thanks,
Jen



On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:

On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 18:10, Jennifer Ward wrote:
On Jul 13, 2004, at 8:03 PM, Michael Becke wrote:


Another way to handle this problem is to use the "expect 100 continue" feature of HTTP. This feature is disabled in HttpClient by default, as only a few servers support it correctly. You can re-enable it by calling setUseExpectHeader(true) on the post method.

Yes, Oleg mentioned this a few days ago. It sounds like this feature
still causes the request to get sent twice (even though the request
body will not get sent if the server cannot receive it). I was hoping
for a way to send each request only once (with the correct auth header
the first time).

Jennifer,

This can be done if you are prepared to handle the entire
authentication
process manually (actually with HttpClient 3.0 it can be done quite
easily). The question is if it is really worth the trouble. It is
important to understand Digest authentication scheme is more secure
primarily because it involves frequent challenge-response exchanges.
The
server generates a nonce which is used by the HTTP clients to produce
the password digest. If the server is configured to change the nonce
too
often, that would basically defeat any sort of preemptive
authentication
mechanism, in the worst case rendering it even less efficient than
'expect-continue' handshake. If the server is configured to keep the
nonce for too long, that would inevitably make Digest authentication
less secure. It is not impossible to strike a balance between
efficiency
and security. The question is whether the performance gains really
justify additional complexity

Oleg


I'm not having much luck with that though, so I may
end up using the "expect 100 continue" feature after all.

Thanks
Jen


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



*********************************************************************** ****************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system.
*********************************************************************** ****************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to