Hello, Michael Maggs wrote: > Flatbed scanners can be good, but only if they are of the (much more > expensive) type that has an additional light in the lid as well as under > the glass. > > Michael > > David Gerard wrote: >> 2009/5/8 Jon Davis <[email protected]>: >> >>> Not exactly a recommendation but a suggestion of something to avoid: There >>> are a number of flatbed scanners that have "film scanner" attachments. If >>> you plan on scanning a lot of negatives I'd suggest not buying something >>> like this because they are typically very slow. >> >> They're also completely awful and give terrible results. I know this >> one from the "negative holder" that came with my flatbed scanner ...
Yes, after a long search, I finally decided to ask a professional protographer to digitize my old films and slides instead of buying a scanner. For film, it comes to about 0.25 € per image, and 0.50 € per slide. I found cheaper on the web, but I don't know about the quality. >> - d. Yann -- http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net http://fr.wikisource.org/ | Bibliothèque libre http://wikilivres.info | Documents libres _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
