On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Chris McKenna <cmcke...@sucs.org> wrote:
> So what is "appropriate for children"? How about - 'not likely to get the student at a typical high school sent to offfice for sexual harrassment, inappropriate usage of school resources, or the website as a whole blocked in typical software. Would not result in the firing of a teacher if they were to distribute the image to the children. Would not have criminal or legal ramifications if you brought the image to the school and began distributing it the children.' > And whose "common sense" do we > choose - it seems that in your opinion it is common sense that this image > is not appropriate, yet in mine it is fine. Neither of us are alone in > our opinions. Whose opinon is correct? If by showing the image to children in a public school setting there could likely be legal ramifications (going to jail, getting placed on a sex offender list), then chances are - common sense would dictate that it is inappropriate for children and by extension inappropriate for the front page of commons. Tom M. LetterRip _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
