On 27 July 2011 16:00, Daniel Schwen <li...@schwen.de> wrote:
>>> I asked on this list a few years about negative scanning. The topic's
>>> come up again at http://saveaussiemusic.org/ , so I wrote this up:
>
> I have quite a bunch of slides myself. And I was wondering how the
> slide scanners stack up against photographing a projected slide. Dark
> room, high quality screen, camera on a tripod, manual white balance,
> exposure bracketing. This should give decent results with a good SLR.
> Unfortunately I don't have my slides accessible right now.

With a SLR, there's an even simpler approach for slides - you can get
a simple slide duplicator, which is not very much more than a tube
with a lens mount at one end and a clip for the slide at the other.
Once you get suitably even lighting behind it, you're sorted - slide
in, click, next slide, click, next slide, click. The image quality,
when I tested this, seemed pretty good.

Unfortunately, most of the duplicators on the market date from the
film era, and so the focal length is off for a smaller digital sensor
- it's going to give you a little crop of the centre of the slide. You
could use a full-frame camera, if you have one lying around, or it's
possible someone has made shorter APS-sized ones.

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to