On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Thomas Nichols wrote:

> Has a commons.logging.Log.setLevel() been ruled out for architectural
> reasons? This would have kept my code generic.

Yes, because it is out of scope and inconsistent with the charter of
commons-logging.

>
> Thanks,
> Thomas.
>

Craig

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to