On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Thomas Nichols wrote:
> Has a commons.logging.Log.setLevel() been ruled out for architectural > reasons? This would have kept my code generic. Yes, because it is out of scope and inconsistent with the charter of commons-logging. > > Thanks, > Thomas. > Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]