Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk <at> bluewin.ch> writes: > > > You got me intrigued. I'll take a look at 3.0. Maybe in 3.0 the developers can > > reach a point of self-confidence sufficient to change the usage recommendation > > in the docs? > > > > By the time HttpClient 3.0 goes BETA we will certainly revisit this > issue. >
Cool. > Obviously you command a pretty good knowledge of HttpClient 2.0 > internals. LOL. In reality, all I know about it is a result of staring at the source code for 2-3 hours after my code using HttpClient was reviewed and the reviewer noted that it is buggy according to HttpClient docs since I wasn't putting the executeMethod() call inside a try block, but rather in front of it :-) Anyway, the source was readable enough to find my way around it rather quickly. Since I could prove that 2.0 code won't actually leak connections even if the method call isn't in the guarded block, and since you clearly stated that you won't make changes in the future releases that'd mandate it to be inside the guarded block, I'm rather satisfied - my code is both correct and futureproof as-is. > If you had a look at 3.0aplha1 and let us know whether you > see it as improvement compared to 2.0, it would be greatly appreciated I'll try to give it few peeks when time allows. I got somewhat hooked :-) Cheers, Attila. > > Oleg > -- home: http://www.szegedi.org Visit Szegedi Butterfly fractals at: http://www.szegedi.org/fractals/butterfly/index.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
