AFAIK nothing like that scheduled. I was wondering how would this look like for something ordered like a list?
What would happen if transaction a added a an enttry at position 0 and transaction b another one at position 1? Would this even be allowed in parallel? How would the resulting list look like? There is no such problem for maps as they are not ordered and have keys as unique identifiers. Oliver On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:51:51 +0100, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any planned transactional wrapper around lists, queues > or EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.Channel ? > > Cheers, > Guillaume > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
