Hi Markos, On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 16:18 +0300, Markos Charatzas wrote: > By the way, is release 1.7 going to address the issues with the > "call-method-rule" and "call-param-rule" ?
No. > On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:08, Markos Charatzas wrote: > > The only reason Im using "call-method-rule"s in this case (and not a > > "bean-property-setter-rule" is that I want the "set-next-rule" to fire > > prior to to the "call-method-rule". Other than making a custom > > "set-next-rule", is there any other way to achieve this? I think a custom SetNextRule is the best solution. I've added an enhancement request in bugzilla for this: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095 Regards, Simon -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
