I could make a public "suspend()" method within the thread that calls "Continuation.suspend();", but the problem is that the second user just gets a continuation object and has no reference to the actual thread.
Please note that you don't really need to make it "public" as Continuation.suspend() is a public static method. All that matters to the state of the continuation is kept in thread locals ...which is also why you cannot really have another thread like that inside a flow. Synchronization problems aside I remember I was playing with that and had it working to some extend - I'll try to dig that out. But I would not want to synchronize the methods just to support something that somehow just feels ...wrong. Maybe explain your usecase... cheers -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
