On 8/5/06, Anil Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You mentioned "It's not as sophisticated as proguard that does even remove dead code inside classes." However Proguard leaves libraries alone. Does your minijar operate on libraries? eg. commons-net-1.4.jar Or would I have to build the jar from the original source?
Not sure what you mean by "However Proguard leaves libraries alone" ...but minijar does work on the jar - no need for the sources. It does remove unused classes but not methods like proguard does. I personally found the gain of removing methods too small to justify the effort. (did a few comparisons) HTH -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]